Report published in The Observatory, Vol. 127 (2007) 375-379
- Electronic publishing: reviews/progress reports
- Evaluation and electronic publishing
- New publishing models
- The role of learned societies
- Bibliometric and other evaluation criteria
Rationale
Fifteen years after the first international meeting on electronic
publishing (Strasbourg, October 1991) from which originated many of
today's materializations and collaborations in the field, where do
we stand? Electronic mailings and web postings have profoundly
changed the way our community works and communicates, but when the time
comes to publish refereed documents, we are still mainly producing
electronic versions of documents printable or otherwise available on
paper instead of practising full electronic publishing.
Why is that? While maintaining a diversity of media is certainly desirable, are there technical barriers (for instance at the level of archiving) to going fully electronic for our verified knowledge? Are there sociological limitations in a scientific community known for being usually at the leading edge of the related technologies? One of these limitations might be that, down to the real rating, evaluation committees (of programmes, of individuals, of institutions) primarily take into account refereed "papers" available through traditional channels. Should not the evaluation processes reflect the complementarity of the various media?
Commercial publishers are coming up with new publishing models. What are these and are we heading their way? On the other hand, authors/editors are delivering today finalized/immediately publishable material, but it can sometimes remain sitting for months with publishers or subcontractors not always producing satisfactory results. The question of rights is sometimes raised too as commercial publishers are reselling at high cost information to institutions from which it originally came. What role could learned societies play in this context? Should we accept proposals for community-supported minimum-work wiki-like servers? Are we ready for Open Access? And, if so, for which publications?
Bibliometric tools, mainly citation-based ones, have been multiplying of late. What are they measuring exactly? Should we opt for specific ones or for several, each adapted to specific needs? Should we develop other evaluation criteria?
Participants are advised to secure their rooms as soon as possible (European events can quickly saturate hotels in Brussels).
André Heck Léo Houziaux Strasbourg Astronomical Observatory Belgian Royal Academy of Sciences, "heck_at_astro.u-strasbg.fr" Letters and Fine Arts
Please check this page regularly for possible updates.